Of course, it’s always difficult to compare different jurisdictions, there are many factors at play, and this is only a snapshot, but the numbers still speak volumes. Clearly, there is much less going on here in NSW epidemiologically compared to Switzerland, even if you assume for a minute that the PCR tests are actually measuring what they’re allegedly supposed to measure, and yet NSW has much stricter restrictions in place.
We are in the middle of a mass psychosis. And so it is not surprising that the arguments of those in favour of vaccine passports is just as irrational as all the other Covid measures, such as lockdowns and mask wearing and all the other nonsense over a disease with an almost 100% recovery rate that only affects a small proportion of the population.
I don’t usually just re-post content on my website. But a recent interview with Prof. Mattias Desmet explains so well the reasons why most of the world is going nuts over Covid, I felt it was best to simply re-post the entire interview. Thankfully, Kate Wand had already prepared an English-only version of the interview a day after it was first streamed, and that’s what I’m posting below. An interesting aside: This interview, streamed live on Friday 30 July on YouTube, was removed by YouTube in record time by the next day.
Prof. Desmet says there are 4 conditions that need to exist in a society for a mass psychosis to emerge: lack of social bonds, lack of sense making, free-floating anxiety and free-floating discontent. He goes on to explain why even highly intelligent and educated people are so susceptible to believing in a plainly absurd narrative and no amount of rational argument can convince them otherwise. Encouragingly, it also explains why some people (thought to be about 20% of the population) are immune against such nonsense. The interview left me with at least some hope: all totalitarian systems are inherently self-destructive – let’s hope that sets in sooner rather than later.
Sometimes, you just can’t take it anymore in these crazy lockdown times, and the anger just has to be vented, at something or someone. We’d like to think that our politicians are in charge – that’s open for debate of course, but they sure like to congratulate themselves when they think they’ve done something wonderful, so when they stuff up big time, they need to hear that too.
And so I sat down earlier this week and wrote an angry email to our state’s leader, Gladys Berejiklian. I know she won’t read it, and even if she did, she wouldn’t care, but it feels good to at least have tried, and I got my frustration off my chest, addressing the person in the driver’s seat in New South Wales.
And it is good to see that I’m not the only one who thinks our leaders have lost their marbles over Covid. Even some in the mainstream media seem to have woken up. Here an article from Steve Waterson from The Australian. But this is what I wrote to our Premier:
17 July 2021
Dear Ms Berejiklian
Until the latest lockdown, I thought you were one of the more reasonable leaders in this country, one of the “moderates”.
Just as I thought the world was slowly coming to its senses, at snail’s pace mind you, the recent G7 Summit in Cornwall proved me completely wrong.
There is simply no end of the Covid madness in sight. On the contrary, the pharmaceutical industry that’s been driving the vaccination agenda from the very beginning of this calamity, has just received some more tailwind from the G7 “leaders.”
Anyone with commonsense would probably think that rushing to bring any kind of medical product to market is quite foolish and potentially dangerous. And it’s not like this hasn’t happened before. The 2009 swine flu vaccine is just one example – lucky back then most countries realised that that particular pandemic was fake, and so the vaccine was not that widely accepted and only a few hundred people, mainly in Sweden, were left with life crippling long term damage (narcolepsy).
This time, things are very different. A well-oiled 24/7 propaganda machine made sure almost the entire world lost its marbles in lockstep, big pharma is ready to cash in on this manufactured crisis, whilst politicians are looking forward to emerge as the heroes who saved their people from certain death. It’s a win-win … for them! Not for you, for them! Because this is not about your health, it’s about saving their bacon and making them even richer and more powerful.
It would stand to reason that developing and producing new vaccines based on new technology never before tested in humans would take a tad over 300 days – say 3,000 days, before you could possibly say that they’re safe to use – if in fact they do turn out to be effective and not have serious and/or long-term adverse effects. Neither has been proved even remotely since the launch of these vaccines, but who really cares? All genuine and well-founded warnings about these rushed-through Covid vaccines have been ignored, downplayed, ridiculed, deemed conspiratorial, censored.
So confident (or self-deluded?) are the great and mighty leaders of the so-called free world, that they now declare that punching out vaccines in 300 days isn’t anywhere near fast enough. They go along with the sage advice of the wise heads of the oh so holy and heroic pharma industry, who reckon that 100 days should be the goal.
And of course, you’ll believe that, won’t you, because you’ve gone along with everything else they’ve thrown at you over the last year and a bit…
On Saturday 12 June I attended a demonstration in Sydney organized by No Health Passports. In a first for me, I spoke as well and my speech is reproduced below in full. The turnout was still very modest (I counted about 40 people), but it was good to connect with a bunch of people who also care about our democratic rights and freedoms being unreasonably compromised during this time of mass psychosis.
This is the continuation of my previous post. My vote arrived in my home municipality after 10 days of travel – and that via express post!
And the results? About 60% of the population aged 18 and older cared enough about their future to vote on these important issues. That’s a very high turnout.
Well, it was always a long shot. The Covid law has been affirmed by the Swiss people overall. Nevertheless, the results are actually encouraging. Close to 40% of those who voted, over 1.2 million people out of a total population of roughly 7.3 million adults (16%), voted against. That’s more than I would have hoped for. And, what’s more, some of the cantons actually voted against the law (shown in light brown). Health minister Alain Berset sees this as a green light to continue with the introduction of a Covid-19 certificate. But a further referendum against just this measure has already been flagged. Read more here in English.
As for the CO2 law, I was actually on the winning side! Almost 52% of voters were against this nonsense. Read more here in English.
As for the new anti-terror law, just over 43% voted against this unnecessary and almost Orwellian piece of legislation. Read more here in English.
Also, unsurprisingly the Swiss people are apparently ok with the use of synthetic pesticides and the prophylactic use of antibiotics in food production. Read more here in English.
On 13 June the Swiss will cast their yes or no vote on three laws against which a significant minority of at least 50,000 people had mounted a referendum.
I have done my bit and voted against all three, the Covid law which gives the federal government powers to do many things which it should be allowed to do, the CO2 law which is based on a wrong assumption anyway, and the anti-terrorist law which would give the police unjustifiably wide and easy to abuse powers.
Interestingly, in the case of the Covid law, the information booklet contains the original text of the law from September 2020, which has since been worsened several times, so three of the most offensives sections are not even in the booklet. The current law is available here.
As we we needed more proof that this entire Covid debacle is based on nothing but nonsense, the US Centre for Disease Control, which has led the official narrative on many fronts, has introduced another layer of deception. I couldn’t explain it any better than this article from the Off-Guardian, so I’m just linking to it here, and I summarise briefly:
Those who have been vaccinated but two weeks after vaccination test positive via PCR test are called ”break-through infections.” Of course it’s not a good look when such break-through infections occur, because that would call into question the effectiveness of the vaccines, so the fewer such break-through infections, the better. So what does the CDC do? They simply change the rules some time in April/May by requesting that labs only submit positive results with a Ct value of equal or less than 28. Of course this guarantees that much fewer positive results will be notified, as the CDC is well aware that labs routinely use much higher Ct values of over 35 and even over 40.
