On 17 Nov 2020 I saw the tweet below from Germany’s most reputable newspaper (if there is such a thing). I honestly thought it had to be a fake. It’s not. Unfortunately, most of the article is behind a paywall, but even the tweet is enough to get a flavour. It reads: “The high Covid-numbers in many Western countries beg the unsettling question whether open societies are less suited to react to global threats than authoritarian systems. This calls for a new debate.”

The latest news on the latest COVID-19 “cases” and “deaths” cannot be flung into the media soup fast enough to keep the population suitably scared to keep the scamdemic alive. But the mainstream media are not so fast and keen when the news are not so convenient – for example the news that the Australian Government has given indemnity against liability to the suppliers of the prospective vaccines should anyone come to harm as a result of being administered the vaccines.

In other words, the pharmaceutical giants not only get to benefit handsomely from this manufactured crisis, they also don’t take any risk at all by providing insufficiently tested and potentially harmful substances.

In the morning of 9 October I saw the SMH & Age articles announcing this scandalous fact, which let’s face it, doesn’t really come as a surprise as other countries have done the same – albeit countries which unlike Australia have a no-fault vaccination compensation scheme, and the world’s saviour, Bill Gates has called for indemnities all along. There are few other sources that have picked this up so far, and even on Twitter there is relatively little reaction.

I checked ABC News, the government’s faithful distributor of propaganda – nada.

So was there a media release perhaps announcing this delightful, completely unimportant fact? I checked. Of course not! At least not yet.

Unless you read the Budget Papers released on 6 October you would never stumble across this information. Budget Paper No. 1 states:

What strikes me most is the silence by most of the mainstream media, but again, given they’ve been faithfully dancing to the government’s tune for the entirety of this scamdemic, this should not be a surprise either – but it’s worth pointing out as another instance of the fact that our governments are only sharing the scare-mongering information they want us to hear, hoping that we won’t notice the foul stench of the New Normal that’s being cooked up behind the scenes.

We’ve now wasted half a year of our lives under medical martial law. And all this over something that was never more than a test pandemic (in more ways than one), over a virus which manifestly only harms a tiny proportion of the population no matter what.

Some pandemic! 

If this really was a pandemic with demonstrably many millions dying in a short time from some kind of virus or bacteria, across the world, regardless of age group, it would be as obvious as it is now that none of the predicted horrors scenarios will ever be the case with the Sars-Cov-2 virus.

If nothing else, this crisis has been very revealing, bringing out the worst in humanity.

So, thank you, governments around the world, thank you for wrecking our lives. Thank you for taking advantage of such loosely drafted laws that give you the power to do just about anything you like with us. Thank you for abolishing even the semblance of democracy we had before. Thank you for pretending to care for people and saving lives when in fact you’re causing unimaginably more harm by the nonsensical measures you are imposing. Thank you for causing fear and panic in the population which you know to be the perfect tool to make citizens compliant. Thank you for nothing!

Thank you for nothing also to corrupt scientific advisers and medical doctors who, beholden to pharmaceutical interests and the politicians that feed them, and perhaps seeing their once in a lifetime chance to shine in the spotlight, have thrown the scientific method over board and are aiding and abetting in the biggest crime against humanity the world has ever seen.

Big business has also deserved a thank you for nothing. Surely these intelligent people could see that something was wrong here and would now use their usual influence to prevent the predictable damage that would follow? But of course, big businesses know they can take a hit, whereas their smaller competition couldn’t, and governments would always bail them out anyway, so why would they care? And let’s face it: some of them are laughing all the way to the bank thanks to this scamdemic.

Also a big thank you for nothing goes to the mainstream media around the world, which have proved how utterly compromised and useless they are in exposing and challenging shady and harmful political and economic interests. By unquestioningly falling in line with the governments’ narrative and by committing censorship, they lost the last little bit of credibility they might have had. Thankfully there are alternatives.

As someone who has never for a second fallen for the irrational hype and hysteria, and as someone who constantly questions everything, including himself, with respect to the current scamdemic I keep coming back to the same question:

Why? 

All this madness we’re living through right now can only make any kind of sense when you take a very holistic and a historical view. But it’s a bloody scary path to follow. 

The technocratic, anti-human dystopia the powers that be are euphemistically calling The New Normal is certainly not a world I want to live in, but we’re headed that way at breakneck speed. I wonder if enough of us will wake up soon enough to throw the fools over board and turn this ship around.

The only rays of hope, that this injustice might one day end, come from the increasing number of people who speak out, perhaps even protest. Medical experts who have maintained or found again their integrity and question the measures. A small but slowly growing number of lawyers and politicians who are prepared to stand up for human and civil rights.

Prof. Christian Drosten is a household name in German-speaking countries. Not so much elsewhere, yet he is a crucially important figurehead in the COVID-19 test pandemic that continues to plague the entire world.

A cult has developed around Drosten, but not quite everyone is a fan. Some people haven’t forgotten that the high profile virologist was already heavily involved in the needless scaremongering in the non-event that was the 2010 swine flu, which led to the development of a rushed vaccine that resulted in a huge amount of waste and some considerable harm to those unfortunate people who got vaccinated and subsequently developed narcolepsy. (Looks like history could be about to repeat itself…)

Despite this, Drosten is the German Government’s only trusted advisor, or was, until recently.

Actually, Drosten is the one who developed the very first PCR test for this allegedly new Chinese virus. On 1 January, the very day he heard about the possible SARS cases in China, and without having any validated scientific evidence, he developed the test. He submitted the test to the WHO within days, and on 21 January, the WHO endorsed it to the rest of the world, even before he published his study! The rest is history. The timeline and arguments that Drosten has committed scientific fraud is available here (in German).

So you could say Drosten is the guy who kicked off this entire madness. Without him developing this test, we would have been none the wiser the world we would have continued along its imperfect but normal path. Well, it’s not quite like that, as the Chinese also developed their own test, presented only shortly after Drosten, according to Prof. Ulrike Kaemmerer, but she does pull apart the sloppy work by Drosten in this interview as part of the German Stiftung Corona-Ausschuss hearings. In any event, Drosten’s test was favoured by the WHO.\

Interestingly, Drosten, in his first NDR podcast on 3 March, Drosten was still saying there was no need to panic about COVID-19.

Even when MERS was in the news in 2014, Drosten was saying things that are diametrically opposed to the claims he is making today, things that would land all those who do not strictly adhere to the COVID-19 Government-imposed narrative in hot waters. In this article which appeared on 16 May 2014 in the German economic magazine Wirtschaftswoche, he comments, when asked about the usefulness of high-frequency application of the PCR test in Saudi-Arabia:

Yes, but the method is so sensitive that it can detect a single hereditary molecule of this virus. For example, if such a pathogen scurries across the nasal mucosa of a nurse for a day without her getting sick or noticing anything else, then she is suddenly a MERS case. Where previously terminally ill people were reported, now suddenly mild cases and people who are actually in perfect health are included in the reporting statistics. This could also explain the explosion in the number of cases in Saudi Arabia. In addition, the local media have been cooking up the matter to unbelievable heights. […] In the region there is hardly any other topic in the TV news or daily newspapers. And doctors in hospitals are also consumers of this news. They also consider that they should keep an eye on this disease, which is very rare in Saudi Arabia. Medicine is not free of fashion trends.

Unbelievable, isn’t it? And it gets better. Asked about what should be done about the excessive focus on this disease, he says:

It would be very helpful if the authorities in Saudi Arabia were to revert to the previous definitions of the disease. After all, what interests them first are the real cases. Whether symptomless or mildly infected hospital employees are really carriers of the virus is questionable in my opinion. Even more questionable is whether they can pass the virus on to others. The team of advisors to the new Minister of Health should distinguish more clearly between medically necessary diagnostics and scientific interest.

Interestingly, he sings such a very different tune today. Sure, it’s a different virus that does seem to pass amongst humans. But even today, neither he nor anybody else from the establishment cares about the definition of a case. In these heady Covid days, you test positive and you’re a “case” no matter what. Better still, you die not matter how, if you have that RNA sequence in your system, you’re sure to be counted as a Covid death. And the media of course are only telling the truth now in his view, because they’re faithfully repeating what he says and giving him a great platform. Perhaps the fact that German channel NDR has even given Drosten his own podcast series is telling. Ambitious virologist are only human.

Drosten could soon find himself in hot waters himself. A group of German lawyers are in the process of launching class action law suits in the US and Canada, suing Drosten and his team, for bringing onto the market a let’s call it unsuitable product, on which all the harmful government measures that were taken are ultimately based. Interesting approach. A translation of the very good interview with the lawyer spearheading this initiative is available here.

There are also fascinating revelations around Drosten’s status as a professor, including the mysterious circumstances around his PhD thesis, and the many interesting relationships and conflicts of interest Drosten enjoys, in hearing 22 of the German Stiftung Corona Ausschuss.